mikki wrote:I am fed-up of hearing the Stanza Stones justification for the crap that they are going to carve on the stones on the moors.
The comparison between pre-historic carvings, Victorian carvings & the crap that they are going to carve on the moors, just goes to show how uneducated these people are.
Did Pre-historic folk have pen & paper to doodle on? did they have OS maps to find their way around?
And as for this retarded idea of "tradition" of graffiti in Victorian times being carved on the moors - well, how many of the Victorians in Ilkley could even read or write? And the vast majority of the Victorians didn't even known about the pre-historic carvings, as they were only first noticed by a small group of educated enthusiasts from late-1860's onwards - and the people who did 'graffiti' carvings then, were oblivious of the older prehistoric carved stones, which were only just being discovered. They simply 'did not know' about such things.
Now today's Stanza Stones bunch ..... well, what can I say. They are supposed to be an educated bunch - but obviously not. Unless they are using their own ignorance to be deliberately immoral.
Mikki
My problem with the people forcing stone memorials on the Moors and beyond is the lack of respect for history of the region. There have been some great books written recording these stone markings, and Yorkshire along with Northumberland are two regions singled out for seeing them by experts who have valued their presence.
The tragedy is that while singling the region out for this vandalism, with poor if any rationale for supporting the project, the whole region loses the integrity of its marvelous and valuable heritage. The people of Ilkley who support adding debris and hubris to the moors obviously fail to understand how much prehistoric value there is under their noses.
Sadly, once the landscape is vandalised further by others who will follow suit, this heritage will fall into obscurity and future generations will be denied the capacity to decode the messages left by ancestors when or if new insights come to light.
Ilkley seems more concerned with establishing itself as a literary capital, preferring to ignore the fact that most tourists who would visit, do so because of its historic importance.
Pity we couldn't cobble a questionnaire together to go out and get a cross section of responses from those visiting the lit festival this month, and compare that to one delivered on the moors during the summer when most tourists are up there. Or we could have counted how many lit visitors actually EVER go up on the moors?