The Northern Antiquarian Forum

Archaeology, folklore & myth of Britain's pre-christian sites & heritage: stone circles, holy wells, maypoles, tombs, archaic cosmologies and human consciousness. Everyone welcome - even Southerners!


    Thom on film

    Share
    avatar
    PeteG

    Join date : 2009-02-01

    Thom on film

    Post  PeteG on Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:16 pm

    BBC Chronicle

    prof Thom on film at the beeb way back when,
    Pete
    avatar
    cropredy

    Join date : 2009-02-02

    geometry

    Post  cropredy on Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:17 pm

    It was really good to see this man , I really warmed to Him.

    He was though FITTING the geometry to the sites.
    As I am sure You realise I detect precisely this geometry, and all the sites I have visited demonstrate that the sites were simply positioned upon this detectable geometry.
    The geometry IMHO is universal, and thus all the planets and moons and stars are created upon the geometry.
    But the reason for placing materials upon the geometry is to interact and manipulate a duality of flows that travels about on what I consider are phase conjugate optical lasers that are the geometry.
    Those flows are interfered and manipulated relative to the apparent positioning upon the geometry of the moon /planets and stars.
    The most relevant times and alignments are the solstice and equinox dates, but not of a visual nature, however stunning and awesome they may be.
    Kevin
    avatar
    PeteG

    Join date : 2009-02-01

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  PeteG on Sat Jan 23, 2010 4:45 pm

    the difference is that Thom was believable and was willing to demonstrate his theories and findings.
    You are not.
    You just want people to believe you and as far as I can tell, after years of you posting on forums you still haven't got one convert.

    No doubt you will see this as an attack on yourself and rant and at me (again)
    avatar
    Paulus

    Join date : 2009-08-20
    Location : Yorkshire

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  Paulus on Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:14 pm

    PeteG wrote:BBC Chronicle

    prof Thom on film at the beeb way back when,
    Pete

    That was excellent to watch Pete! Cheers for that. I still love the fella's stuff, even though I don't buy all of his ideas. I think it's his obvious passion for the megaliths which endears me to him - and he did give us the best megalithic ground-plans of the sites.

    If you find anymore of this sorta stuff, please let us know.

    All the best - Paul
    avatar
    Paulus

    Join date : 2009-08-20
    Location : Yorkshire

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  Paulus on Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:33 pm

    cropredy wrote:It was really good to see this man , I really warmed to Him.

    Careful Kev. He was a scientist and mathematician affraid - and I'm pretty sure you've been telling folk over the last year or 3 that such people don't have clue! Unless of course, you're learning that there are some good academics out there who actually do have things to add to this field. It'd be good if that started happening.

    atb - Paul
    avatar
    PeteG

    Join date : 2009-02-01

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  PeteG on Sun Jan 24, 2010 3:54 am

    Paulus wrote:
    PeteG wrote:BBC Chronicle

    prof Thom on film at the beeb way back when,
    Pete

    That was excellent to watch Pete! Cheers for that. I still love the fella's stuff, even though I don't buy all of his ideas. I think it's his obvious passion for the megaliths which endears me to him - and he did give us the best megalithic ground-plans of the sites.

    If you find anymore of this sorta stuff, please let us know.

    All the best - Paul

    did you watch the Silbury dig film?
    Shame the Beeb didn't put the Hakwins/Thom Chronicle episode online as I have been after this for ages.
    Let me know if you succeed in downloading the flash file as I have been trying all week and nothing works.
    The Beeb are sneaky buggers.
    I suppose I could try waving dowsing rods over the screen to see if they can grab the flv file?
    Pete
    avatar
    cropredy

    Join date : 2009-02-02

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  cropredy on Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:05 am

    PeteG wrote:the difference is that Thom was believable and was willing to demonstrate his theories and findings.
    You are not.
    You just want people to believe you and as far as I can tell, after years of you posting on forums you still haven't got one convert.

    No doubt you will see this as an attack on yourself and rant and at me (again)

    Blah, blah, blah.
    I recognise You as a fabulous photographer with a passion for the megaliths.

    I will demonstrate to anyone anytime whenever is convienient, I do this almost none stop.
    I have no desire for You or anyone to believe anything, but please do not ascribe wrong information about myself or My actions.
    You make Yourself look foolish and very biased in doing so.
    Thom applied His expertise into what was a passion for him, as do you with the photography.
    I am doing the same, but from an area that is My expertise.
    I do not pass judgement on others fields of expertise, I am not capable of doing so, but can recognise where faults and mistakes are.

    I have had enough of the garbage that has been constantly hurled My way for three years, it is pathetic and below contempt.

    I do find the geometry displayed by Thom, it is naturally there, if you cannot see or comprehend of it, no problems, I certainly can't fathom which way a camera points.

    This is no "RANT"
    You are the one ranting, again.

    The geometry is a kind of scaffolding that supports flows in duality of spin states commonly called plasma.
    I sense it as alive, and have the ultimate of respect for this omni present STUFF.

    The layering in the centre of silbury hill was also very very interesting, I did say so on the stones forum , only for the post to be deleted.
    I likened the layering to Wilhelm reichs methods of constructing his orgone box's.
    But He was jailed, his books burn't, and he died the day he was to be released.
    Maybe there is an over ride written into our DNA that creates the "BURN THE WITCH" in seemingly sane and educated people?
    Kevin
    avatar
    cropredy

    Join date : 2009-02-02

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  cropredy on Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:20 am

    Paulus wrote:
    cropredy wrote:It was really good to see this man , I really warmed to Him.

    Careful Kev. He was a scientist and mathematician affraid - and I'm pretty sure you've been telling folk over the last year or 3 that such people don't have clue! Unless of course, you're learning that there are some good academics out there who actually do have things to add to this field. It'd be good if that started happening.

    atb - Paul

    I do have a problem, and basically that is My inability to communicate.
    I am certain that many have information to add, but they are very cleverly restrained in a system that maintains a veil.
    I,ve peeked round that veil.
    Kevin
    avatar
    PeteG

    Join date : 2009-02-01

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  PeteG on Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:26 am

    see kev you try to turn it around so that its poor old you being attacked. (again)
    You have been challenged on other forums and you just spit venom and refuse to cooperate.
    Put up or shut up.
    Your ravings are boring and frankly new aged egotistical bollux.

    You choose not to prove your abilities and it makes you look unbelievable.
    I don't even know why I am wasting my time talking to you again!
    avatar
    cropredy

    Join date : 2009-02-02

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  cropredy on Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:07 am

    PeteG,
    You are the one accusing and attacking, not Me.
    I am turning nothing around , and don't feel at all bothered.
    YOU, that's YOU PETE G started accusing Me, get it?
    YOU PETE G.
    I am as far removed from "NEW AGED egostistical bollux " as anyone could be, I have never even smoked a cigarette.
    I am an almost invisable and ordinary sort of person.

    YOU PETE G are the one here and now "spitting venom", YOU.
    Look in a mirror, it's YOU.

    Now where was I?????/
    Oh yes Thom, lovely man, but a plonker.
    Talanted, meticulous, dedicated, but blind as to WHY.
    The geometry He found is there, but not because anyone needed to be able to know it or work to it at all.
    SURELY, it is obvious that a common usable system lies encoded in all of these megaliths all around the globe , all from seperate time frames on different continents???

    I only look in here once in a blue moon, and straight away the self same garbage.
    I.ve pulled off the meg , not because I want to, but because of this never ending bollux, to use YOUR language.
    I don't have to prove anything, I am merely reporting.
    You operate in the photography realm, that is easy, as is a mechanic or accountant , or any other relevant hobby or job in the reality that our physical body is part of.
    I am reporting what is of another dimension where there is no such normal evidence or language to describe it.
    I can fully understand YOU been bored with what I say, so simply ignore it, stop racing in like a knight in shining armour to defend the systen You declare is the one and only.
    Do have a nice day.
    Kevin
    avatar
    PeteG

    Join date : 2009-02-01

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  PeteG on Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:22 am

    absolutley bonkers!
    I think you really need psychiatric help old fellow...you live in a make believe world of your own that no one else can see.

    21st Century schitzoid man!

    for instance "But the reason for placing materials upon the geometry is to interact and manipulate a duality of flows that travels about on what I consider are phase conjugate optical lasers that are the geometry."

    doesn't Mean Anything to anyone but you!
    avatar
    cropredy

    Join date : 2009-02-02

    Bonkers

    Post  cropredy on Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:50 am

    PeteG wrote:absolutley bonkers!
    I think you really need psychiatric help old fellow...you live in a make believe world of your own that no one else can see.

    21st Century schitzoid man!

    for instance "But the reason for placing materials upon the geometry is to interact and manipulate a duality of flows that travels about on what I consider are phase conjugate optical lasers that are the geometry."

    doesn't Mean Anything to anyone but you!

    Blah, blah, bah.
    Consider this quote,
    Everything is determined,the beginning and the end, by forces which We have no control .
    It is determined for insects as well as for the stars, human beings, vegatables or cosmic dust.
    we all dance to the mysterious tune, intoned in the distance by an invisable piper.

    Someone called einstein.

    He was wrong, We can have contol over it and have had.
    Also it's not invisable , if You use the senses given You.

    Any more names to call Me ??????

    Kevin
    avatar
    PeteG

    Join date : 2009-02-01

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  PeteG on Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:08 am

    yeah but Einstein makes Sense. Something you don't seem to be able to do in any way.

    "But the reason for placing materials upon the geometry is to interact and manipulate a duality of flows that travels about on what I consider are phase conjugate optical lasers that are the geometry."

    is meaningless gibbering...
    avatar
    PeteG

    Join date : 2009-02-01

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  PeteG on Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:10 am

    anyone else want to jump in on this now useless thread?
    I've had enough of this idiot.

    I'll start another thread on Thom later so that others can talk sense about him without this nut jumping in with his cackle....
    Pete
    avatar
    cropredy

    Join date : 2009-02-02

    plonker

    Post  cropredy on Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:30 am

    PeteG wrote:anyone else want to jump in on this now useless thread?
    I've had enough of this idiot.

    I'll start another thread on Thom later so that others can talk sense about him without this nut jumping in with his cackle....
    Pete

    "Idiot"and "NUT"


    If your expecting Myself to react to YOUR infantile name calling, Your mistaken.

    All things by immortal power.
    Near and far,
    hiddenly'
    To each other linked are,
    that thou canst stir a flower without troubling a star.
    Francis Thompson.

    Kevin
    avatar
    cropredy

    Join date : 2009-02-02

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  cropredy on Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:46 am

    PeteG wrote:yeah but Einstein makes Sense. Something you don't seem to be able to do in any way.

    "But the reason for placing materials upon the geometry is to interact and manipulate a duality of flows that travels about on what I consider are phase conjugate optical lasers that are the geometry."

    is meaningless gibbering...

    To YOU perhaps.

    Phase conjugate optical lasers are time reversed signal pathways.
    I am alpha and Omega.
    Everything I detect has a FIELD about it, due to scale , I stick to human scale.
    That FIELD has a shape called ANU, with a centre point where signals both start and finish, by plotting these fields about many things I can think the same outwards and inwards to all scale.
    I find these laser signals to be one inch in width, and the geometry they create is detectable and the megaliths Thom surveyed are sited to FIT onto this invisable geometry.
    Travelling upon these geometric pathways is two discernable flows always travelling in opposite direction and on top of each other along the geometry.
    This STUFF is commonly referred to as the aether.

    The geometry never ever varies at all, and it is my opinion that it never will do, or ever has .
    The flows are much different though, they do vary constantly, and react with in a symbiotic manner with all things in creation.
    It is My opinion that they empower all in creation to REMEMBER how it is orientated, every finite part of every atom, every planet, every star.

    Kevin
    avatar
    PeteG

    Join date : 2009-02-01

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  PeteG on Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:03 am

    all bullshit.
    google says No results found for "Phase conjugate optical lasers are time reversed signal pathways".

    sigh

    thats the last from me.
    I wish I was a mod here, this fool would be gone like Kaiser Soze
    avatar
    cropredy

    Join date : 2009-02-02

    kaiser soze

    Post  cropredy on Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:32 am

    PeteG wrote:all bullshit.
    google says No results found for "Phase conjugate optical lasers are time reversed signal pathways".

    sigh

    thats the last from me.
    I wish I was a mod here, this fool would be gone like Kaiser Soze

    How predictable.
    Carefull with the phase conjugate, it will lead You into superluminal areas, and then if strange lights on your pictures , specks of dust may not be all there is?

    I am honoured to be the fool, but unless You know the tarrot cards You won't understand why, especially the orientation of his staff, I am a fool, and proud of it.
    http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/9711011
    Kevin
    avatar
    PeteG

    Join date : 2009-02-01

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  PeteG on Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:42 am

    no your not the fool in the tarot (two T's not three)

    your an idiot who has too much time who hijacks people research with your insane gibbering hoping for some attention.
    Thats all your getting from me.

    Paulus mate, I'm outta here. This guy ruined Stonespages forum and it seems he is out to trash this board now as well.
    I'll be in the other place if you need me,
    Pete
    avatar
    cropredy

    Join date : 2009-02-02

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  cropredy on Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:49 am

    PeteG wrote:no your not the fool in the tarot (two T's not three)

    your an idiot who has too much time who hijacks people research with your insane gibbering hoping for some attention.
    Thats all your getting from me.

    Paulus mate, I'm outta here. This guy ruined Stonespages forum and it seems he is out to trash this board now as well.
    I'll be in the other place if you need me,
    Pete

    You slanderous liar.
    How in hell could I have ruined stonepages?
    YOU need to look carefully through this thread , it demonstrates clearly who is causing the problems , and that is YOU PETE G.
    Your a liar.
    Kevin
    avatar
    cropredy

    Join date : 2009-02-02

    spelling

    Post  cropredy on Sun Jan 24, 2010 12:02 pm

    PeteG wrote:no your not the fool in the tarot (two T's not three)

    your an idiot who has too much time who hijacks people research with your insane gibbering hoping for some attention.
    Thats all your getting from me.

    Paulus mate, I'm outta here. This guy ruined Stonespages forum and it seems he is out to trash this board now as well.
    I'll be in the other place if you need me,
    Pete

    Your old chesnut about spelling.
    YOU tell Me off for spelling tarot as tarrot.
    Then like the buffoon YOU are say two t's not three.

    I don't want YOUR attention at all, the attention You are displaying for all to see here is one of constant ridicule and an attempt to force Me off this forum by means of blackmail .
    You are the one who is ATTACKING and RIDICULING me constantly and never endingly.
    YOU need to look carefully at YOURSELF, and the posts on this thread.

    I have no desire to listen to YOUR garbage here or anywhere else.
    So Your pathetic , I'm taking MY bat and ball home unless You get rid of Him little pathetic exercise is a waste of time.

    Kevin, the fool.
    avatar
    Paulus

    Join date : 2009-08-20
    Location : Yorkshire

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  Paulus on Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:15 pm

    Hi Kev -

    Do y' self a favour here: don't start waffling about your energy perceptions & stuff on here - unless you can give damn good clarity and focus to the issues you and other people discuss. As someone who's had many more years exploring the 'energies' and stuff at megalithic sites than yourself, clarity in this arena is a necessity, both for me personally and this Forum. If you're not sure wot I mean, please refer to the works of Guy Underwood, Tom Graves, T.C. Lethbridge, and their ilk, for guidance. They presented their finds & dowsing results eloquently (whether they were right or wrong or another matter). You still have a long way to go in relation to your perceptual abilities about the energetic frameworks embedded in the universe - be aware of this and have more humility in your approach and what you perceive as other people's lack of perception. The fact that you find it difficult (& I know it can be) to articulate matters such as the ones you are experiencing is one thing; but throwing it into each & every Forum & thinking those that don't experience the Universe like you do are silly is, quite frankly, short-sighted of you and (sorry) narrow-minded aswell. You need to slow yourself down somewhat; your appraisal of the sciences needs revising (considerably); and the way you experience the Universe has still to be integrated. You've a long way to go mate. Be aware of that please. Other people can see you, and your experience of the universe, very clearly - much clearer than you. Appreciate what I'm saying. You are not the only person who knows the universe is very very alive - but notice how others around you, who can see things clearer than you, do not shout their mouths off about it. Does this not tell you something?

    This last issue is the most telling and shows you still to be somewhat childish in your approach. Calm down. Slow down. Reappraise your approach/s. Then start again...

    I've said enough.
    avatar
    PeteG

    Join date : 2009-02-01

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  PeteG on Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:28 pm

    cropredy wrote:

    You slanderous liar.
    How in hell could I have ruined stonepages?
    YOU need to look carefully through this thread , it demonstrates clearly who is causing the problems , and that is YOU PETE G.
    Your a liar.
    Kevin

    you be Very carefull here old bean!
    I am a Mod on Stonepages and have all the logs etc and the messages from many members telling us they are leaving the forum because of your rantings.

    You stand up in court and tell a judge you've dowsed the truth compared to all my written and dated material and you will be in a whole world of trouble.
    Now do yourself a favour and go and play with the little one's elsewhere instead of bothering the grown ups!
    avatar
    Paulus

    Join date : 2009-08-20
    Location : Yorkshire

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  Paulus on Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:41 pm

    Hey Pete!

    PeteG wrote:...Paulus mate, I'm outta here. This guy ruined Stonespages forum and it seems he is out to trash this board now as well.
    I'll be in the other place if you need me,

    Kev won't fuck this small forum up at all. It simply won't happen. I won't let it. I appreciate where you're coming from, but please allow a little parental patience, if y' get wot I mean! (it won't take long I assure you) Wink

    atb - Paul
    avatar
    PeteG

    Join date : 2009-02-01

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  PeteG on Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:54 pm

    Hi Paul,
    this bloke has jumped in on several threads I have started on various forums with his wibblywobbly and put lots of people off joining in.
    On Stonepages I can delete him if he subverts yet another thread.

    I wanted a chat about Thom with you and others.
    As you know I have a lot of interesting Thom material in my possesion and I don't appreciate being taken off track by having to take time to tell someone they are talking gibberish.
    I don't suffer fools gladly.
    Maybe we should start this thread again?
    Pete

    Sponsored content

    Re: Thom on film

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Aug 20, 2017 8:36 am